Comments of the Slovak Society for Laboratory Medicine ( SSLM ) to the EFLM Accreditation Proposal

September 22, 2017

Introduction

Dear Elisabeth and Elvar,

 

sorry to be late.  I was bothered last month with finalisation of “Laboratory Medicine” learning texts ( Elvar, Hans-Jörg and Ralf know what I am writing about ).  Here are my considerations:

 

Comments

  • LEE proposal gives 6 credits per day, the SACCME ( EACCME ) directive gives 8 credits;  LEE proposal contains Blooms taxonomy, the SACCME / EACCME directive does not quote this classification system

  • information, that UMES sets unacceptable conditions to EFLM is not good news

  • recent documents issued at national level ( Directive of the Slovak Ministry of Finances ) and international level ( Med Tech Code ) negatively influence the conditions for organizing scientific events - they limit the area for negotiations with sponsoring bodies

 

Conclusions

  • LEE proposal contains updated and practical informations:   it is an excellent manual for organizing and categorizing scientific events 

  • as we have to follow the national legislation ( which is EACCME ) asking EFLM accreditation at given situation rather complicates the organizing scientific events ( doubled administration and fees )

 

Questions

  • what is the reason for allowing only 6 credits per day instead of 8 credits ?

  • what is unacceptable for EFLM in the process of negotiations with UEMS ?

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Please reload

Najčítanejšie

Úvod

Koncom  minulého týždňa som dostal z MZ SR žiadosť o stanovisko k podpisovaniu, tlačeniu, poskytovaniu listinných výsledkov a vedeniu dokumentácie...

Stanovisko k podpisovaniu, tlačeniu, poskytovaniu listinných výsledkov a vedeniu dokumentácie v diagnostickom laboratóriu

October 10, 2017

1/4
Please reload

Najnovšie
Please reload

Archív
Please reload

Značky

I'm busy working on my blog posts. Watch this space!

Please reload

Social
  • Facebook Basic Square
  • Twitter Basic Square
  • Google+ Basic Square